The mediating effects of socio-behavioral factors on the needs for help among Asian American breast cancer survivors

Background: Breast cancer survivors often report their high needs for help during the transition to cancer survivorship. During the COVID-19 pandemic, technology-based programs are increasingly popular because of their high flexibility and accessibility in delivering information and coaching/support to address the current needs for help among cancer survivors. Yet, little is known about how socio-behavioral factors influence the effects of a technology-based intervention on the needs for help of racial/ethnic minority breast cancer survivors, especially Asian American breast cancer survivors. Purpose(s): The purpose of this secondary analysis was to examine the multiple socio-behavioral factors (including attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived barriers, and social influences related to breast cancer survivorship) mediated the effects of a technology-based intervention on the needs for help among Asian American breast cancer survivors. Method(s): This analysis was conducted with the data from 199 Asian American breast cancer survivor women who were recruited from January 2017 to June 2020 through online and offline communities/groups. The needs for help were measured using the Support Care Needs Survey-34 Short Form (SCNS) with five domains on psychological, information, physical, support, and communication needs. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro within SPSS. The analysis determined the mediating effects of four socio-behavioral mediators on the needs for help at pre-test [T0 ], post 1-month [T1 ], and post 3-months [T2 ] of a technology-based intervention. Result(s): Overall, all the mediators had statistically significant mediation effects on all types of needs for help (p < .05) at different points. Attitudes and social influence presented statistically significant mediation effects on the total needs for help score over 3 months (T0 , T1 , and T2 ). Perceived Barriers had mediation effects on all types of needs for help over 1 month (T0 , T1 ). Self-efficacy mediated the effects on all types of needs for help only at post 1 month (T1 ). Conclusion(s): The findings supported that all the socio-behavioral factors (attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived barriers, and social influences) mediated the effects of a technology-based intervention on the needs for help of Asian American breast cancer survivors. Future research and practice should consider socio-behavioral factors to reduce their needs for help during their survivorship process.

Use of Digital Health Technology Among Older Adults With Cancer in the United States: Findings From a National Longitudinal Cohort Study (2015-2021).

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of digital health technology use, older adults with cancer (ie, aged 65 years) have reported challenges to technology adoption. However, there has been a lack of a good understanding of their digital health technology use patterns and the associated influential factors in the past few years. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the trends in and factors associated with digital health technology use among older adults with cancer. METHODS: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) data set is a national longitudinal cohort study with annual survey waves of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Participants were community-dwelling older adults who self-reported previous or current cancer diagnoses in each round. The study sample size of each round ranged from 1996 (2015) to 1131 (2021). Digital health technology use was defined as using the internet or online in the last month to order or refill prescriptions, contact medical providers, handle Medicare or other insurance matters, or get information about their health conditions. The association of sociodemographics, clinical factors (self-rated health, chronic conditions, difficulties in activities of daily living, dementia, anxiety, and depression), and physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery and grip strength) with digital health technology use was examined using design-based logistic regression. All statistical analyses accounted for the complex sample design. RESULTS: The prevalence of any digital health technology use increased from 36% in 2015 to 45% in 2019. In 2020-2021, which was amid the COVID-19 pandemic, it ranged from 51% to 52%. In terms of each digital health technology use behavior, in 2015, overall, 28% of older cancer survivors used digital health technology to obtain health information, followed by contacting clinicians (19%), filling prescriptions (14%), and handling insurance (11%). Greater use of digital health technology was associated with younger age, being White, having a college or higher education, having a higher income, having more comorbidities, nondementia, and having a higher gait speed. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health technology use in older adults with cancer has gradually increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, socioeconomic and racial disparities have remained in older cancer survivors. Additionally, older adults with cancer may have some unique features associated with digital health technology use; for example, their use of digital health may be increased by their comorbidities (ie, health care needs) and reduced by their frailty.

Returning to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of head and neck cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: UK head and neck cancer incidence and prevalence in working-age people are increasing. Work is important for individuals and society. Head and neck cancer survivors return to work less than other cancer survivors. Treatment affects physical and psychological functioning long-term. Evidence is limited, with no UK qualitative studies. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted, underpinned by a critical realism approach, involving semi-structured interviews with working head and neck cancer survivors. Interviews were conducted using the Microsoft Teams communication platform and interpreted using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen head and neck cancer survivors participated. Three themes were drawn from the data: changed meaning of work and identity, return-to-work experiences, and the impact of healthcare professionals on returning to work. Physical, speech and psychosocial changes affected workplace interactions, including stigmatising responses by work colleagues. CONCLUSION: Participants were challenged by returning to work. Work interactions and context influenced return-to-work success. Head and neck cancer survivors want return-to-work conversations within healthcare consultations, but perceived these as absent.

Changes in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and self-reported cognitive function in cancer survivors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) and reductions in sedentary behavior (SED) may mitigate cancer-related cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the associations between changes in PA, SED, and cognitive function in cancer survivors before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; and (b) clinical subgroups that moderate this association. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered online to adult cancer survivors globally between July and November of 2020. This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey examining changes in self-reported PA and quality of life in cancer survivors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-reported Questionnaires assessed moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) using the modified Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, cognitive function using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) scale, and SED using the Domain-specific Sitting Time questionnaire. Cancer survivors were classified into no change in behavior, desirable change (i.e., increase MVPA to meet PA guidelines or decrease SED by ≥60 min/day), and undesirable change (i.e., decrease MVPA to <150 min/week or increase SED by ≥60 min/day). Analysis of covariance examined differences in FACT-Cog scores across the activity change categories. Planned contrasts compared differences in FACT-Cog scores between cancer survivors with (a) no meaningful change vs. any change, and (b) a desirable change vs. an undesirable change. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in FACT-Cog scores across activity-change categories in the full sample of cancer survivors (n = 371; age = 48.6 ± 15.3 years (mean ± SD)). However, cancer survivors who were diagnosed ≥5 years ago (t(160) = -2.15, p = 0.03) or who received treatment ≥5 years ago (t(102) = -2.23, p = 0.03) and who had a desirable change in activity reported better perceived cognitive abilities than those who had an undesirable change. CONCLUSION: PA promotion efforts should consider reducing SED in addition to maintaining MVPA in long-term cancer survivors to mitigate cancer-related cognitive impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Developing Contemporary Survivorship Clinic for Recipients of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: Survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has improved tremendously over the last few decades. HCT survivors are at increased risk of long-term complications and secondary cancers. This poses unique challenges to the HCT-related healthcare system given the growing need for survivorship care. Developing a HCT survivorship program with a dedicated clinic to survivors ensures equitable access to care and ongoing patient education. Herein, we describe our program survivorship model and our initial experience. Method(s): The Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) survivorship clinic (SC) planning committee was initiated in September 2019. The SC was launched in January 2021 with the mission to provide high-quality, comprehensive, and personalized survivorship care and to empower patients and community health care providers with education and a roadmap for screening for late effects. The SC initially focused on allogeneic (allo) HCT patients and later opened to autologous (auto) HCT recipients in February 2022. HCT patients are referred by primary HCT team after HCT with an emphasis on preferred timeframe of initial SC visit no earlier than 3 months but less than 12 months from HCT. SC is located at 2 physical locations: main campus and satellite, with virtual visit options to account for the distance from MCC and COVID considerations. SC applies a consultative model. SC is staffed by dedicated advanced practice professional (APP), supervised by SC faculty. The scope of SC care includes but is not limited to prevention of infections (education, vaccinations), surveillance of late effects (endocrine, pulmonary function, cardiac, bone health), and general cancer screenings (breast, colon, skin cancer). Patients' clinical data from SC inception to August 2022 were reviewed. Result(s): From January 2021 to August 2022, a total of 138 patients were seen in SC. The majority were seen in person (62% in clinic, 38% by virtual visit). Median age was 58 years (range, 19-82). Median time to first SC visit was 21 months (range, 3-1464) after HCT. Allo HCT was the most common type of HCT seen in clinic (87%, n=120). Most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (43%, n=59), myelodysplastic syndrome (17%, n=23), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (10%, n=14). Only 17 patients (12%) were seen in 2021 but the volume increased significantly in 2022. Currently there are more than 10 patients seen in SC per month. Conclusion(s): We report successful experience in launching a contemporary HCT SC despite the challenges of an ongoing COVID pandemic. As a stand-alone cancer center, we serve a wide geographical location with subspecialty and primary care providers dispersed throughout the community. Our consultative model and experience could provide a useful guide for other programs. In 2023, we plan to expand our SC to a broader population of patients receiving other cellular immunotherapies.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Managing Survivorship after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With improvement in survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), it has become important to focus on the late complications experienced by the survivors that may lead to late mortality and morbidity to be able to provide patient-centered care across the transplant continuum. The goals of this article are to describe the status of literature on late complications in HCT survivors; offer a brief overview of the status of the screening, prevention, and management of these complications; and identify opportunities for future practice and research. RECENT FINDINGS: This is an exciting time for the field with increasing awareness about survivorship issues. Studies are moving beyond description to examining pathogenesis of these late complications and identifying biomarkers. The eventual goal is to promote changes in our transplant techniques to decrease the incidence of these complications as well as help develop interventions targeting these late effects. There is also an emphasis on improving health care delivery models to provide optimal post-HCT management for medical and psychosocial complications through close coordination between multiple stakeholders and leveraging technology to help address the barriers in delivery of care to fulfill the unmet needs in this area. The increasing population of HCT survivors with their burden of late effects underscores the need for concerted efforts to improve long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes for this group.

COVID-19 and the Psychosocial Impact of Breast Health Delays

INTRODUCTION: Reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delays for breast health care. Data are sparse regarding the impact of these delays on psychosocial outcomes. METHOD(S): Women seeking breast health care across a multi-site breast program in a large metropolitan area were assessed for psychosocial outcomes including depression, stress, and anxiety as it related to delays in care. Psychosocial outcomes were evaluated utilizing validated instruments (PROMIS, PHQ-9). Outcomes were stratified by treatment group (healthy, breast cancer, survivor) and Kaplan-Meier curves created for breast cancer patients to evaluate the relationship of time to treatment stratified by dichotomous psychosocial outcomes. Demographic and clinical data was ed from the electronic medical record. RESULT(S): 85 women enrolled in the study including 30 (35%) breast cancer patients, 24 (28%) healthy women, and 31 (36%) breast cancer survivors. Overall, 58% reported a delay in breast health care including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, medical oncology treatments, clinical appointments, breast imaging and/or biopsies, survivorship follow-up, support groups, and/or screening. Compared to women in the no delay group, a greater proportion of women reporting a delay had high anxiety (78% vs. 58%;p = 0.06), high perceived stress (45% vs. 28%;p = 0.17), high loneliness (67% vs. 32%;p = 0.003), moderate or higher depression (16% vs. 8.3%;p = 0.34), and no or low emotional support (58% vs. 28%;p = 0.008). Among breast cancer patients, the first treatment modality was surgery in 73% and the median time to treatment was 33 days. The median time to treatment was 40 days for breast cancer patients reporting a delay compared to 28 days for patients reporting no delay. Longer time to treatment was observed among breast cancer patients with high versus low anxiety, perceived stress, loneliness, and depression and for patients with low versus high emotional support. CONCLUSION(S): Women with and without breast cancer reporting a delay had worse measures for anxiety, depression, perceived stress, loneliness, and emotional support. Longer time to treatment was experienced by breast cancer patients with worse psychosocial measures. Risk stratification of women seeking breast health care during the COVID-19 pandemic is needed to identify and support those at risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes. (Table Presented).

Describing and exploring physical activity experiences among adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods survey study.

Understanding if (and how) adults with cancer perceived their physical activity (PA) levels have changed (or not) since the COVID-19 pandemic and why this may have occurred is important. Given current gaps in knowledge, the purpose of this study was to explore PA experiences among adults with cancer amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals were eligible if they were currently ≥19 years of age, had been diagnosed with cancer ≥18 years of age, and were living in Canada. 113 adults affected by cancer (Mage = 61.9 ± 12.7 years; 68% female) completed the survey which asked closed- and open-ended questions about PA levels and PA engagement experiences. Most participants (n = 76, 67.3%) were not meeting PA guidelines, and reported engaging in, on average, 89.2 ± 138.2 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous PA. Participants indicated their PA declined (n = 55, 38.7%), did not change (n = 40, 35.4%), or increased (n = 18, 15.9%) since the start of the pandemic. Participants described their changed PA as due to public health restrictions, lowered motivation during the pandemic, or cancer- and treatment-related effects. For those engaging in similar or greater PA, online home-based and outdoor PA were shared as main forms of PA. Findings suggest PA behavior change support and ongoing access to online, home-based and outdoor PA options will be required as pandemic restrictions ease in this population.

Impact of Social Isolation, Physician-Patient Communication, and Self-perception on the Mental Health of Patients With Cancer and Cancer Survivors: National Survey Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is perceived as a life-threatening, fear-inducing, and stigmatized disease. Most patients with cancer and cancer survivors commonly experience social isolation, negative self-perception, and psychological distress. The heavy toll that cancer takes on patients continues even after treatment. It is common for many patients with cancer to feel uncertain about their future. Some undergo anxiety, loneliness, and fear of getting cancer again. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of social isolation, self-perception, and physician-patient communication on the mental health of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. The study also explored the impact of social isolation and physician-patient communication on self-perception. METHODS: This retrospective study used restricted data from the 2021 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), which collected data from January 11, 2021, to August 20, 2021. We used the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method for data analysis. We checked for quadratic effects among all the paths connecting social isolation, poor physician-patient communication, mental health (measured using the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-4]), and negative self-perception. The model was controlled for confounding factors such as respondents' annual income, education level, and age. Bias-corrected and accelerated (BCA) bootstrap methods were used to estimate nonparametric CIs. Statistical significance was tested at 95% CI (2-tailed). We also conducted a multigroup analysis in which we created 2 groups. Group A consisted of newly diagnosed patients with cancer who were undergoing cancer treatment during the survey or had received cancer treatment within the last 12 months (receipt of cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic). Group B consisted of respondents who had received cancer treatment between 5 and 10 years previously (receipt of cancer treatment before the COVID-19 pandemic). RESULTS: The analysis indicated that social isolation had a quadratic effect on mental health, with higher levels of social isolation associated with worse mental health outcomes up to a certain point. Self-perception positively affected mental health, with higher self-perception associated with better mental health outcomes. In addition, physician-patient communication significantly indirectly affected mental health via self-perception. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide important insights into the factors that affect the mental health of patients with cancer. Our results suggest that social isolation, negative self-perception, and communication with care providers are significantly related to mental health in patients with cancer.

Disruption in Cancer Care During Early Survivorship due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine.

PURPOSE: The extent to which adults with cancer during early survivorship experienced disruptions in care due to COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their experiences with the transition to telemedicine, remains understudied. METHODS: We examined cancer care disruption and satisfaction with telemedicine due to COVID-19 in 361 adults (Mage = 59.42, SD = 11.3) with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer during early survivorship. The Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire (TSUQ) and patient self-report Cancer Care Disruption Index (CCDI) was administered via RedCap survey. RESULTS: The most prevalent areas of patient-reported cancer care disruption included supportive care appointments canceled/postponed (57%), in-person appointments changed to virtual appointments (56%), social work services canceled (32%), palliative care appointments canceled/postponed (24%), elective surgeries related to cancer postponed (23%), and screening tests postponed (19%). Regarding patient satisfaction with telemedicine, 78.0% "agree" or "strongly agree" that they were satisfied with the overall telemedicine system. Most survivors reported satisfaction with their doctor dealing with problems (88.2%), doctors answering patient questions (92.7%), and engaged patients in care (86.1%), However, 49.3% of cancer patients disagreed that virtual visits are as satisfying as in-person visits and 35.6% were dissatisfied with the lack of physical contact during virtual visits. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer survivorship care, with supportive care, social work services, and mode of delivery (in-person vs. virtual) particularly affected. The downstream impact of cancer care disruption in those living with cancer during the pandemic as well as the quality of telehealth modality as part of cancer survivorship care delivery await future investigation.

Adolescent and Young Adult Survivorship Care: Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic Stronger Through Teleoncology.

The Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) survivorship clinic at Tufts Medical Center transitioned to telehealth appointments when ambulatory clinics closed at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. This review analyzes 195 survivorship telehealth visits for 90 patients, diagnosed with cancer younger than the age of 40 years. This cohort, seen during the Massachusetts State of Emergency, exemplifies the success and acceptance of telehealth among AYA survivors. The clinic's long-term goal is to advocate for telehealth as a standard in AYA survivorship care; however, telehealth faces increasing barriers as modifications to address the pandemic are amended or lifted.

Support for patients with MBC

Over the last decade we have witnessed rapid advances in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with seminal discoveries in cancer biology, correlative biomarkers and clinical trials leading to multiple new drug approvals. While these milestones have improved survival, the science of survivorship in this population is just beginning. The diagnosis of MBC is life-changing and requires individualized and multidisciplinary support. The NCI defined the areas of epidemiology and surveillance, symptom management, psychosocial research, health-care delivery, and health behaviors as necessary fields to advance the state of the science in advanced cancer survivors. A multifaceted program addressing these domains is needed to assess MBC patients and their unique and ever-changing needs. With input from patients and providers, program components should include: therapeutic clinical trials, multidisciplinary specialty care, individualized patient navigation, peer support, continuing education, and patient reported outcome (PRO) collection to support patients living with MBC. Input for a program for MBC patients can be guided by a multidisciplinary steering committee in which patient advocates are a major voice. Patients can provide insight into what works for them, and what they are facing may be very different from the experience of an early-stage breast cancer patient. Clinical trials designed to advance the current scientific knowledge of breast cancer treatment are essential to patients living longer, more fulfilled lives with MBC. Clinical trials may include systemic therapy, local therapies such as surgery and radiation for MBC patients, side-effect management and quality of life (may put elsewhere). A comprehensive systemic therapy portfolio should include all biological subtypes as well as recommended treatment options (hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy). Multidisciplinary care is necessary to diagnose and treat any condition the MBC patient may encounter and is essential in providing quality care. Comorbidities and debilitating side effects arising from cancer treatment are known to be associated with inferior outcomes. MBC patients may experience lack of familiarity of some providers with novel MBC cancer treatment, side effects, and interactions of their cancer treatment with non-cancer conditions and treatment. With the increasing life expectancy of MBC patients, it is important to manage the medical comorbidities in coordination with the MBC patient's cancer treatment. Integrative Medicine helps support the quality of life of patients through providing clinical modalities such as stress management, yoga, meditation, acupuncture, massage and lifestyle counseling. Supportive care helps support cancer related fatigue and sleep challanges, geriatrics and hospice and palliative care for advanced cancer patients. The role of navigation for MBC patients is unique and should be designed to support the patient's many individual needs. Navigation requires assessment of individual knowledge deficit, coordination of care challenges, internal resource utilization, cultural requests, and emotional health. Navigation should also address the patient's financial and disability questions, medication assistance, symptom management, advanced care planning and goals of care discussions. Additional items to be discussed during navigation visits include primary care provider utilization, COVID-19 vaccination, illness and medication questions, and other patient questions as they arise. A comprehensive registry of MBC patient's medical records and histories will assist researchers in designing future therapeutic and quality of life clinical trials. The categories of patient demographics, clinical variables, pathological variables, treatment variables, outcomes of MBC, and PROs will create a robust registry. A comprehensive patient registry can create a rich database which can guide and inspire future innovative research. Peer support through support groups and peer-to-peer matching s pivotal to MBC patients finding and utilizing their patient voice, emotionally supporting each other and learning from other's similar experiences. Connection between patients and the creation of a community of survivors can empower patients to positively impact their care through self-advocacy and self-efficacy. Continuing patient education is also essential to providing quality cancer care. The format of a weekly virtual education webinars are helpful in creating an engaged patient community and a platform to disseminate educational resources in a reoccurring digestible format. Frequent educational webinars covering a wide variety of topics can positively influence patient interactions with their healthcare providers and influence how patients living with MBC view their own cancer experience. Educational webinars provide opportunities for patients to connect with subject matter experts, other patients like themselves, and share information with their family and friends. Informed patients can discuss and ask questions more confidently with their health care providers about information and services presented during the educational webinars. The symptom profile of patients living with MBC are impacted by numerous variables such as disease burden, treatment plan, comorbidities, supportive regimen etc. The collection of PROs has been shown to improve patient satisfaction with his/her care, improve quality of life, decrease emergency room visits and hospitalizations, and increased overall survival. The routine measurement and management of MBC patients' symptoms has been found to be integral in providing comprehensive cancer treatment. The collection of PROs improves patient and provider communication and elicits the outcome to symptoms that matter most to each patient. Patients diagnosed with MBC are living longer because of the recent advancements in therapeutic treatments. A multifaceted and comprehensive program consisting of therapeutic clinical trials, multidisciplinary specialty care, individualized patient navigation, peer support, continuing education, and PROs collection is integral to fully support patients living with MBC.

Implementing System Solutions for Survivorship Care Plans

Background: A survivorship care plan (SCP) is a detailed cancer care summary and future care plan that is generally given to a patient upon completion of adjuvant treatment for a cancer diagnosis. The initial goals of SCPs were to educate patients and other health care professionals about the treatments received, make them aware about potential long-term effects of therapy, and emphasize recommendations for future cancer screening and care (1). Due to numerous barriers-scheduling, staffing, and lack of awareness-SCPs are not delivered to all eligible patients. To address this unmet need our multidisciplinary breast clinic (MDBC) established an Advanced Practice Professional (APP) Survivorship Clinic. With the acute impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, survivorship referrals decreased. We, therefore, developed and implemented system solutions to address SCP access. Method(s): System solutions include partnering with the Cancer Registry to provide the list of patients potentially in need of survivorship visits, partnering with pharmacy to confirm patient eligibility, creating specifically designated telemedicine survivorship visits in our electronic scheduling system, prospectively scheduling persons identified, engagement of APPs across the MDBC, and establishing a single coordinating point. Numbers of SCPs delivered are tracked monthly and patient satisfaction is assessed through data collected Press Ganey surveys. Result(s): This presentation will share our process interventions and outcomes as they mature. Our early data demonstrate the efficacy of the workflow and appear promising. Conclusion(s): We anticipate that system-based solutions will provide more patients with SCPs and demonstrate patient satisfaction. Blaes AH, Adamson PC, Foxhall L, Bhatia S. Survivorship Care Plans and the Commission on Cancer Standards: The Increasing Need for Better Strategies to Improve the Outcome for Survivors of Cancer.

African American Women Breast Cancer Survivors: Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic.

African American women breast cancer survivors are among those with the greater burden of cancer. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death among black women, and this death rate is 40% higher than that of white women. The COVID-19 pandemic increased the burden of morbidity and mortality among this population of cancer survivors. In this report, we explore the ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic was a source of stress for African American women breast cancer survivors and their subsequent responses to these stressors. This is a qualitative descriptive study with content analysis of data from the narratives of 18 African American breast cancer survivors. Participants were interviewed via phone and video conferencing platform and asked questions related to their experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings suggest stressors associated with (1) potential COVID-19 spreaders in their immediate environments; (2) closures and restricted access to social- and faith-based activities; (3) televised news broadcasts of COVID-19; and (4) disruptions to planned cancer prevention and control healthcare. Three categories emerged that captured the ways in which these women responded to stressors during the early phase of this pandemic: (1) seeking control in their social environments; (2) following the rules; and (3) seeking support from God, family, and friends. These findings can be used to better support breast cancer patients during the early phases of a pandemic.

Early survival for patients newly diagnosed with cancer during COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and early survival among newly diagnosed cancer patients. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study used linked administrative datasets from Ontario, Canada. Adults (≥18 years) who received a cancer diagnosis between March 15 and December 31, 2020, were included in a pandemic cohort, while those diagnosed during the same dates in 2018/2019 were included in a pre-pandemic cohort. All patients were followed for one full year after the date of diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess survival in relation to the pandemic, patient characteristics at diagnosis, and the modality of first cancer treatment as a time-varying covariate. Interaction terms were explored to measure the pandemic association with survival for each cancer type. RESULTS: Among 179,746 patients, 53,387 (29.7%) were in the pandemic cohort and 37,741 (21.0%) died over the first post-diagnosis year. No association between the pandemic and survival was found when adjusting for patient characteristics at diagnosis (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.96-1.01]), while marginally better survival was found for the pandemic cohort when the modality of treatment was additionally considered (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.95-0.99]). When examining each cancer type, only a new melanoma diagnosis was associated with a worse survival in the pandemic cohort (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.05-1.49]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients able to receive a cancer diagnosis during the pandemic, one-year overall survival was not different than those diagnosed in the previous 2 years. This study highlights the complex nature of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cancer care.

The Experiences of Post-ICU COVID-19 Survivors: An Existential Perspective using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

COVID-19 has highlighted the vulnerability of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and the negative sequelae associated with ICU treatment. While the potentially traumatic impact of ICU is well documented, less is known about the ICU survivor's subjective experience and how it influences life post-discharge. Existential psychology addresses the universal concerns of existence, including death, isolation, and meaninglessness, and offers a holistic view of human experience beyond diagnostic categories. An existential psychological understanding of ICU COVID-19 survivorship may therefore provide a rich account of what it means to be among the worst affected by a global existential crisis. This study employed interpretive phenomenological analysis of qualitative interviews with 10 post-ICU COVID-19 survivors (aged 18-78). Interviews were structured on existential psychology's 'Four Worlds' model that explores the physical, social, personal, and spiritual dimensions of human experience. The essential meaning of ICU COVID-19 survival was conceptualised as 'Trying to Reconnect with a Changed Reality' and consisted of four themes. The first, Between Shifting Realities in ICU, described the liminal nature of ICU and the need to ground oneself. The second, What it Means to Care and Be Cared For, captured the emotive nature of personal interdependence and reciprocity. The third, The Self is Different, described survivors' struggle to reconcile old and new selves. The fourth, A New Relationship with Life, outlined how survivors' experiences shaped their new worldviews. Findings evidence the value of holistic, existentially informed psychological support for ICU survivors.

Primary care providers' comfort in caring for cancer survivors: Implications for risk-stratified care.

Personalized, risk-stratified care aims to "right size" the involvement of primary care providers (PCPs), oncology and specialized practitioners in caring for cancer survivors. Our survey found limited comfort among PCPs in cancer surveillance and management of treatment-related effects. In hypothetical case scenarios, PCPs reported least comfort in caring for a survivor of childhood cancer, followed by young adult-onset cancer, and greater comfort in caring for a survivor of adult-onset breast cancer. While education and training of PCPs is essential, risk-stratification strategies need to identify patients who may transition to primary care and those who may require ongoing survivorship-focused follow-up.

Experiences of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of AYAs aged 18-49 with cancer in Canada between January and February 2021. Data from survivors, defined as AYAs more than one year off cancer treatment, were analysed. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with psychological distress, loneliness and insomnia. RESULTS: The analysis included 384 survivors. Moderate-to-severe psychological distress was reported by 257 (68.9%) survivors and was associated with an income ≥ $60,000 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.15, 95% CI 1.11-4.17) and the presence of a pre-existing chronic physical health condition (AOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.56). Loneliness was reported by 204 (54.0%) survivors and was associated with being unemployed (AOR 2.26 95%CI 1.18-4.31), pandemic causing finances to be worse (AOR 1.82, 95%CI 1.08-3.06) and the presence of a pre-pandemic mental health condition (AOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.03-3.42). Clinical insomnia was reported by 74 (19.5%) survivors and was associated with employment status as a student (AOR 3.00, 95% CI 1.08-8.29) or unemployed (AOR 3.97, 95% CI 1.46-10.83), earning $60,000 or more in the year 2020 (AOR 4.36, 95% CI 1.43-13.32), having haematologic cancer (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05-4.70) and being single (AOR 2.52, 95% CI 1.08-5.91). Pandemic negatively affected employment, finances, physical activity, cancer care and substance use for 73.9%, 66.5%, 32.5%, 21.8% and 19.2% of survivors, respectively. Worries about finances, contracting COVID-19, cancer treatment increasing the risk of COVID-19 infection, and having poor health outcomes from contracting COVID-19 were reported by 46.0%, 45.6%, 55.0% and 47.3% of survivors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on AYA cancer survivors, and these individuals report high levels of psychological distress, insomnia and loneliness. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors are at risk for worsening mental and physical health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted interventions and support programs are urgently needed to support the mental health of AYA cancer survivors and optimize their health outcomes.